Iran gives negative response to US ceasefire plan amid push for talks
Iranian Officials Criticize US Ceasefire Plan Amid Talks Push
On Wednesday, Iranian officials voiced initial criticism of a US ceasefire proposal, even as intermediaries hinted at the possibility of direct negotiations between the two nations starting as early as this weekend. The 15-point plan, reportedly conveyed by Pakistani representatives, included measures such as sanctions relief for Iran, dismantling its nuclear program, limiting missile use, and reopening the strait of Hormuz, a critical oil passage for roughly 20% of global supply. An Egyptian official added that the proposal might also curtail Iran’s backing of armed groups in the Middle East.
Sticking Points and Skepticism
Some elements of the proposal had been contentious in prior discussions before the war began. A senior Iranian official, speaking to Al Jazeera, called it “extremely maximalist and unreasonable.” Others noted that the country was still evaluating the plan, though they viewed it as overly accommodating to US interests. Iran had previously dismissed diplomatic efforts, mocking President Donald Trump and claiming Washington was negotiating with itself.
Overnight and on Wednesday, Tehran intensified attacks on Israel and Gulf nations, including one that caused a major fire at Kuwait International Airport. Meanwhile, Israel persisted with its aerial strikes on Iran. “Our first and last words have been the same from day one, and it will stay that way: someone like us will never come to terms with someone like you,” said Lt Col Ebrahim Zolfaghari, an Iranian military spokesperson.
Historical Context and Negotiation Challenges
Many components of the 15-point plan were not novel, having been discussed during earlier negotiations. Iran had steadfastly resisted concessions on its ballistic missile program and regional proxy networks, which it sees as vital to its defense against militarily superior adversaries. Egyptian and Pakistani officials suggested in-person talks could begin in Pakistan by Friday, while other sources pointed to Turkey as a potential venue.
Trump claimed the US was engaging with a faction within the Iranian government, including his son-in-law Jared Kushner, special envoy Steve Witkoff, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, and Vice President JD Vance. It was reported that Kushner and Witkoff had proposed a one-month ceasefire during discussions. However, the identity of the US negotiating team remained unclear, as Iranian foreign ministry and military officials denied Trump’s assertions.
Domestic Pressure and Military Movements
Domestic pressure on Trump to conclude the conflict has risen, driven by Iran’s strikes on Gulf energy infrastructure and the near-blockade of Hormuz Strait, which has spiked global oil prices. Prices dropped after the 15-point plan was announced, as investors anticipated an end to the worst energy crisis in decades. A recent poll found 59% of Americans believe the US war in Iran has “gone too far,” while Trump’s approval rating fell to a record low of 36%, attributed to soaring fuel costs and the ongoing conflict.
Israel, on the other hand, has sought to maintain its offensive, aiming to weaken the Iranian regime further. Israeli officials were reportedly taken aback by the US ceasefire suggestion. As diplomacy stalled, the US continued military buildup in the Middle East, with the Associated Press reporting at least 1,000 troops from the 82nd Airborne Division, 5,000 additional marines, and thousands of sailors set to deploy to the region.
“We have a very catastrophic experience with US diplomacy,” stated Esmail Baghaei, the Iranian foreign ministry spokesperson, in an interview with India Today on Tuesday.
